Life Insurance Audit Comparison Calculator

Life Insurance Audit Comparison Calculator

Policy A — Current Policy
Enter 0 for term policies
From your policy illustration
Policy B — Proposed / Replacement
Usually 0 for a new policy
Contestability / transition period
From new policy illustration
Your Profile
How much coverage do you actually need?
What premiums could earn if invested
Metric
Policy A
Policy B
Death Benefit
Annual Premium
Cost Per $1,000 of Coverage / yr
Total Premiums Over Horizon
Net Cost (Premiums − Cash Value Gain)
Opportunity Cost of Premiums
Projected Cash Value (10 yrs)
Coverage vs. Your Goal
Insurer Rating Score
Policy A Score
out of 100
Policy B Score
out of 100

Your Policy Is Probably Older Than Your Last Car and No One Has Looked at It

Think about when you last reviewed your life insurance. For most people, the honest answer is never — or at least not since it was originally sold. Policies get filed away, premiums go on autopilot, and years pass. Meanwhile, your income changed, your family grew, and the insurance market produced products that may be dramatically better or cheaper than what you’re holding.

A life insurance audit is simply the act of pulling out what you have, comparing it against what’s available, and deciding whether to keep it, replace it, or supplement it. It sounds basic. But most people skip it because they don’t have a structured way to run the comparison — and that’s exactly what this free calculator is built to do.

How to Use This Calculator and What Each Field Means

The tool compares two policies head to head across nine metrics and produces a score for each. Policy A is your current policy. Policy B is the proposed replacement or a policy you’re considering. You can also use it to compare any two policies you’re evaluating side by side.

Step-by-step instructions

  1. Under Policy A, select the policy type and enter the death benefit and annual premium exactly as shown on your policy documents or most recent statement.
  2. Enter the current cash value (from your most recent policy statement), the number of years the policy has been in force, and the projected cash value in 10 years from your policy illustration.
  3. Add any surrender charges or early termination fees — this is critical for replacement decisions and often overlooked.
  4. Select the insurer’s AM Best rating, which reflects financial strength. This affects the scoring.
  5. Repeat the same fields for Policy B using the new policy’s illustration and quote documents.
  6. In the Your Profile section, enter your age, the number of years you want to use as a comparison horizon, your actual coverage need, and an opportunity cost rate representing what your premium dollars could earn if invested instead.
  7. Click Compare Policies to see the full side-by-side breakdown, scores, and a recommendation summary.

What the scoring model actually measures

The calculator scores each policy across five weighted categories: cost efficiency (cost per $1,000 of coverage), coverage adequacy relative to your stated goal, projected cash value growth, insurer financial strength, and net cost after accounting for cash value gains. The policy with the higher total score is flagged as the stronger choice based on your specific inputs.

Why cost per $1,000 of coverage matters more than raw premium

A lower premium doesn’t automatically mean a better deal if the death benefit is also lower. The cost per $1,000 of coverage metric normalizes the comparison — it’s the same ratio insurance professionals use when comparing quotes. A policy with a higher premium but much higher death benefit can easily come out cheaper on this measure. Most people never calculate this number, which is why they end up comparing premiums directly and missing the real picture.

A real example of how the math plays out

Say Policy A costs $3,200 per year for $500,000 of coverage: $6.40 per $1,000. Policy B costs $2,900 per year for $750,000 of coverage: $3.87 per $1,000. Policy B is $300 cheaper per year and 50% more coverage. The premium comparison alone understates the difference. The cost-per-coverage metric makes it obvious.

Situations where an audit comparison makes the most difference

There are specific trigger points where running this comparison is worth doing immediately rather than putting it off another year.

When a universal life policy has a performance gap

Many universal life policies sold years ago were illustrated at interest crediting rates that no longer exist. If the policy was projected to sustain itself on those original assumptions, it may now be underfunded — meaning it could lapse before you die unless you increase premiums significantly. According to the NAIC, in-force policy reviews are among the most important consumer protections available, precisely because carriers are not required to proactively notify policyholders of pending lapses until very late in the process.

What changes when the gap has gone on for years

A UL policy that’s been running below projected performance for several years may have accumulated a deficit that’s hard to recover. At that point, comparing it against a new policy becomes urgent rather than optional — because the alternative isn’t keeping a good policy, it’s keeping a deteriorating one. The audit forces that honest comparison before the window closes.

Four things people consistently get wrong when comparing policies

This calculator is only as good as the data you put in. These mistakes are common enough to be worth flagging before you start.

Forgetting surrender charges when evaluating a switch

A policy that looks clearly better on premium and death benefit can turn negative when surrender charges are factored in. Many whole life and UL policies carry surrender charges for 10 to 15 years. Replacing a policy in year 4 might cost you $8,000 in surrender fees that wipe out two years of premium savings. Enter these numbers honestly — the calculator accounts for them in the net cost comparison.

Using the illustrated cash value instead of the guaranteed cash value

Policy illustrations often show two columns: illustrated (assumes current rates continue) and guaranteed (assumes the worst-case rate the contract allows). For a fair comparison, use the guaranteed column when entering 10-year projected cash value — especially for UL and IUL policies where credited rates can vary significantly. The illustrated number is not a promise.

Ignoring the 2-year contestability window on the new policy

Every new life insurance policy comes with a 2-year contestability period. During this window, the insurer can deny a claim if they find a material misrepresentation on the application — and can investigate the cause of death in detail. This means there’s a 2-year period where you effectively have less protection than you think. The calculator flags this in the recommendation, but don’t let the coverage gap concept be invisible in your decision.

Not checking whether you still qualify medically at better rates

The whole premise of replacing a policy is getting better terms. But if your health has changed since the original policy was issued, you may not qualify at the rates shown in the new illustration. Get a preliminary health assessment or at least honest broker feedback before investing time in a full audit comparison. The substandard rate surcharge calculator can show how much a health rating downgrade affects the final premium.

Questions People Have Before Running the Comparison

How often should I audit my life insurance?

A good rule of thumb is every 3 to 5 years, or any time a major life event occurs — marriage, divorce, new child, business ownership change, significant income change, or major asset acquisition. Policy needs shift, and the market changes. A policy that was perfectly sized 10 years ago may now be significantly over or under what’s appropriate.

Can I use this to compare term policies from two different insurers?

Absolutely — that’s one of the most common uses. Enter the respective death benefits, premiums, and insurer ratings, set cash value fields to zero for both, and the comparison narrows to pure cost efficiency and coverage adequacy. The annual vs. monthly premium calculator is a useful companion if you’re also deciding on payment frequency for the new policy.

What does the opportunity cost rate mean?

The opportunity cost rate represents what your annual premium dollars could have earned if invested in a diversified portfolio instead of paid to an insurer. It doesn’t mean you should invest instead of buying insurance — it’s a way of showing the true economic cost of the premium over time. A 6% opportunity cost on a $3,000 annual premium over 10 years shows the full financial weight of that decision, which is useful context when comparing two products with different premium levels.

Should I tell my current insurer I’m shopping for a replacement?

You don’t have to, but in some cases it opens a conversation about policy improvements or adjustments that you may not know are available. Some insurers allow a policy conversion or rider changes that can address the problem without a full replacement. That said, the carrier’s interest is retention, not necessarily your best outcome — which is why running the numbers independently first puts you in a stronger position for any conversation.

What’s a good AM Best rating to require?

A rating of A- or better is the minimum most financial planners recommend for a policy you intend to hold for decades. Anything below B+ carries meaningful financial stability risk over a 20 to 30 year horizon. For permanent policies especially, you want the insurer to be around and solvent when the claim is eventually filed. A lower-rated insurer offering a lower premium may not be the bargain it appears to be.

Is this calculator relevant for business-owned life insurance?

Yes, with some additions. Business life insurance — key person, buy-sell, or COLI — has the same cost and coverage comparison needs as personal policies. The additional layer is the business tax treatment of premiums and the policy ownership structure. The numbers from this calculator serve as the starting point; a business insurance specialist handles the entity-level structuring. For companies reviewing older permanent policies, the policy surrender tax liability calculator is worth running before any replacement decision.

What if Policy B is better on score but switching still seems risky?

Score is one input, not the final word. The score tells you which policy wins on the numbers you entered. But switching also involves underwriting risk (will you qualify?), transition risk (contestability window), and relationship factors (does your current agent have ongoing service value?). A higher score for Policy B is a strong signal to pursue the replacement — but verify the medical underwriting outcome before surrendering Policy A.

What should I do with these results?

Print or save the comparison and bring it to a conversation with an independent insurance broker who isn’t tied to a single carrier. The comparison you’ve run here is your starting framework — it shows which policy is likely stronger and exactly where the gaps are. An independent broker can source actual quotes to validate the Policy B numbers and help you execute the switch cleanly if that’s the direction the analysis points. You might also find the term vs. whole life calculator useful if you’re reconsidering the policy type altogether.

The audit isn’t about finding a reason to switch. It’s about knowing what you actually have — and whether it still fits where you are today.